Tyrant trustees can be your best allies

Posted On Monday, 24 October 2005 02:00 Published by eProp Commercial Property News
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

They insist on having their way. They’re rude, everywhere at once, and a major irritation to occupants of sectional title buildings in South Africa.

These are the trustee tyrants who make some of history’s better known dictators seem like puppy dogs.

But contrary to popular belief, tyrant trustees can be your best allies says Neville Schaefer, CEO ofNeville Schaefer, Trafalgar.

“Many owners and tenants are scared off by strict and dictatorial bodies corporate who are usually very unpopular,” says Schaefer. “But these buildings are generally the best run and should in fact be seen as a positive factor when choosing whether to live in a sectional title complex or not.”

While trustees and managing agents are the “servants” of the body corporate, they also have a sergeant major role to play, he explains.

“A tyrant may be unpleasant. But he is generally very efficient, reliable and action or job-orientated as opposed to people-orientated. This means that things will get done and be kept in good running order”.

Sectional title property, particularly, seem to attract tyrants, “partly because people are most energetic when protecting their property.”

But there is a danger. Unchecked, an authoritarian figure can start looking after his or her own interests first. “This needs to watched fairly carefully. Bending the rules for his or her own purposes results in double standards and can become quite dangerous for inhabitants of a complex.”

In this instance, Schaefer advises that a building has two main options. Firstly, a general meeting should be called and if 25% of the inhabitants rule for the removal of the trustee or chairman, this may be effected. However, he warns that this is often quite difficult to get, as the dominant tyrant personality often ends up with proxies (voting on behalf of others) and can influence the outcome.

The next step should then be the legal route. An ombudsman would play a role to establish if in fact the tyrant is acting out of self or common interest.

Very often it is proved that the action is for the common good, and if this is the case, inhabitants should be grateful despite the fact that the method of managing can be irritating.

But the irritation is a small price to pay to have a building run properly, concludes Schaefer.

 



Last modified on Sunday, 25 May 2014 17:51

Most Popular

Africrest Properties completes mixed-use development, Stanley Studios in Johannesburg

Jan 21, 2020
39 Stanley Avenue
What could be better than living in an extremely well-priced apartment or working in…

Three stocks to boost your portfolio in 2020

Jan 22, 2020
Dr Adrian Saville CEO Cannon Asset Managers
After enduring a trying decade under the mismanagement and malfeasance of Jacob Zuma,…

New hotspots driving cost hikes in key data centre markets - thriving market in South Africa

Jan 21, 2020
Dan Ayley Turner and Townsend
Major global data centre markets are seeing soaring construction costs as development in…

Equites Property Fund Limited to develop a R1.3 bn warehouse for Pepkor

Jan 21, 2020
Andrea Taverna Turisan  CEO Equites Property Fund
Equites Property Fund Limited (Equites) today announced an agreement with leading…

2020 Commercial Property Themes –Electricity supply and cost will be a key wildcard for the Commercial Property Sector this year

Jan 23, 2020
John LoosFNB
Will electricity supply reliability and cost increases become a key issue again in 2020?

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.