Saturday, 22 April 2017 10:51

Competition Commission is looking for precedent setting excessive pricing case

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The South African Competition Commission has referred a supplier of the main ingredient in bricks used in the construction of affordable housing to the Competition Tribunal for charging excessive prices.

Nick_Altini

The Commission said that the supplier of clinker ash for bricks, Afrimat and its two subsidiaries, Clinker and SA Block and Concrete, were referred to the Tribunal for abusing their dominance. According to Nick Altini, Partner in the Competition Practice at Baker McKenzie in Johannesburg, the case is likely to be difficult to prove because of the complexities involved in the assessment of excessive pricing.

Altini says that excessive pricing cases are notoriously difficult to make, because there is so much wiggle room for arguments as to why the supplier sets its prices at the chosen level.

“According to the Competition Act, a dominant firm in a market may not charge a price that is greater than the economic value of the good concerned. The first difficult question is how that economic valued is determined.  This is done by engaging in cost ratio analyses, and by comparing the pricing trends and levels of the same or similar products in comparable markets, but where there is competition.

“Only two excessive pricing cases in South Africa have been tried at the Competition Tribunal - the ArcelorMittal South Africa, case which was remitted back to the Tribunal by the Competition Appeal Court and eventually privately settled, and the Sasol polymers case, which was overturned on appeal,” explains Altini.

“In an excessive pricing case, suppliers could argue, for instance, that they have fairly exploited a market gap, and are being penalised for offering a successful product to the market for which there has been uptake. The Tribunal has to decide whether the firm is reaping the rewards of innovation and risk taking that justifies its price, or if it is exploiting consumers who have nowhere else to go for the same or substitutable product. It is up to the Tribunal to decide whether the profits made are the justifiable returns of a successful business or symptomatic of exploitation by a firm that knows that it is not susceptible to competition from new entry in its market,” he notes.

In the clinker bricks case, it appears the geo-economic conditions are important, as consumers apparently cannot acquire the same or reasonably substitutable products from outside of their geographic region without incurring significant transport costs making the exercise uneconomical. According to the Commission, Afrimat is the only supplier of the ash ingredient for clinker bricks for 100 kilometres, having exclusive rights to three of Eskom’s ash dumps in the area.

“It may be argued that no one would import bricks from more than 100 km away, making them the only supplier in a very small market where there is no likelihood of new market entry to undermine the pricing system, and therefore abusing their dominant position,” Altini notes.

Altini adds that because of the difficulty in proving excessive pricing, “this is an ambitious prosecution for the Commission, but it is not surprising. Although this case is most immediately relevant to a small economy and a small market, there is national interest in these matters as the Commission will be looking to set a precedent for successful excessive pricing prosecutions in the future.”

Last modified on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 11:06

Most Popular

How smart corporates are maximising returns by consolidating their property footprint

Sep 01, 2017
Amrod
For businesses that are seeking to be more efficient and productive, consolidating…

JSE listed Rebosis Property Fund announces R917 million B-BBEE transaction

Sep 01, 2017
Andile Mazwai COO Rebosis
Rebosis Property Fund, the JSE’s first listed black-managed and significantly black owned…

The Property Practitioners Bill set to transform the entire property market

Sep 19, 2017
Storme Heath CAF2
Gazetted in March 2017 for comment, the long-awaited Property Practitioners Bill is…

Growthpoint Properties posts forecast-beating distribution growth and achieves key strategic successes

Aug 31, 2017
Growthpoint Norbert Sasse
Growthpoint Properties today posted distribution growth of 6.9% per share for its…

Energy saving technologies will help consumers prepare for massive electricity price hikes in 2018

Sep 06, 2017
Cala van der Westhuizen
The latest ruling by the Constitutional Court, allowing Eskom to retrospectively ask the…