Fines level playing field in construction industry

Posted On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 13:02 Published by Commercial Property News
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Werksmans Attorneys director Paul Coetser says the Construction Fast Track Settlement Process has worked well.

Paul Coetser Werkmans AttorneysWhile three major settlements are still outstanding‚ including that of Group 5‚ Coetser does not believe the door is closed to those firms that did not reach settlement on Monday.
"To have one big bang finishes a lot of the cases and from now on the construction industry is placed on a competitive footing - to abide by proper tendering practices going forward should be regarded as a win for the Commission and the market as a whole‚'' he said in reaction to the announcement that 15 construction firms had settled collusive tendering cases with R1.5bn in penalties.
The Commission said 21 firms responded to the offer of a fast track settlement. While over 300 instances of bid rigging were revealed through this initiative‚ the settlements were reached only with respect to projects that were concluded after September 2006 - meaning settlement could not been reached with three other firms due to the timing of those deals.
The firms affected are: Aveng‚ Basil Read‚ Esorfranki‚ G Liviero‚ Giuricich‚ Haw & Inglis‚ Hochtief‚ Murray & Roberts‚ Norvo‚ Raubex‚ Rumdel‚ Stefanutti‚ Tubular‚ Vlaming and WBHO. 
The three firms that did not accept the Commission's settlement offer in terms of the fast track process were Group 5‚ Construction ID and Power Construction.
Coetser says the companies involved in negotiations with the Commission would look to make pragmatic decisions‚ like the management time it would take to challenge penalties. ''I do not know whether the three not settling are guilty or not. But now that everything is out in the open others will see the consequences and the parameters and see how that will apply to their particular situations and see whether pragmatically it would also suit them to settle. The way I understand it‚ the door is not entirely closed.''
The Commission will have engaged with each firm that applied and each will have been designated its own time period to come up with an agreement.
The companies which did not settle can be prosecuted‚ with the cases going to Competition Tribunal for a full hearing. Notably‚ those who have settled will have to co-operate and typically agree to testify against those firms involved in the same matters.
''The Commission has been engaged with this process for the past three years and I gather some have not settled‚ clearly because they have not reached agreement. Once they reach agreement‚ they cannot appeal - the next step is to go to the Tribunal and if it is happy with the bargain struck it puts an end to that particular matter. If you were not happy with what the Commission proposed you would not have been in the settlement process. So the ones proposed today are final for those companies today.''

Most Popular

SA REIT Association - Chairman's message and 2021 sector outlook

Feb 02, 2021
Estienne de Klerk_Chairman of SAREIT
Real estate has long been a rewarding sector of the financial markets. Like all sectors,…

It’s cheaper to buy than to rent a home in 2021

Feb 08, 2021
If the past year has taught us anything, it is how important our homes have become to us.

Thavhani City set for more growth in 2021 as its Motor City and medical developments accelerate

Feb 15, 2021
Thavhani City mixed-use urban precinct in Thohoyandou, designed to be the future economic…

Brand new residential development in La Lucia 60% sold through Pam Golding Properties

Feb 15, 2021
Such is the consistent high demand for centrally located, well-priced residential…

Attacq successfully concludes two disposals

Feb 01, 2021
Attacq_CIO_ Peter de_Villiers
Attacq Limited, the JSE-listed REIT and owner and developer of the iconic Waterfall…

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.