Construction companies fined R1.46bn for collusive tendering

Posted On Monday, 24 June 2013 20:30 Published by Commercial Property News
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The Competition Commission has reached a settlement with 15 construction firms, who have agreed to pay fines to the tune of R1.46 billion for collusive tendering.

Construction Industry"The Commission has reached settlement with 15 construction firms for collusive tendering, in contravention of section 4(1) (b) of the Competition Act. The firms have agreed to penalties collectively totalling R1.46 billion," said the commission in a statement on Monday.

The settlements were reached in terms of the Construction Fast Track Settlement Process, launched in February 2011. The fast-track process incentivised firms to make full and truthful disclosure of bid rigging in return for penalties lower than what the Commission would seek if it prosecuted these cases.

According to the Commission, 21 firms responded to the offer of a fast-track settlement.

While over 300 instances of bid rigging were revealed through this initiative, the settlements were reached only with respect to projects that were concluded after September 2006, before which transgressions are beyond the prosecutorial reach of the Competition Act.

Firm settlement amount:

1. Aveng R306 576 143
2. Basil Read R94 936 248
3. Esorfranki R155 850
4. G Liviero R2 011 078
5. Giuricich R3 552 568
6. Haw & Inglis R45 314 041
7. Hochtief R1 315 719
8. Murray & Roberts R309 046 455
9. Norvo R714 897
10. Raubex R58 826 626
11. Rumdel R17 127 465
12. Stefanutti R306 892 664
13. Tubular R2 634 667
14. Vlaming R3 421 662
15. WBHO R311 288 311

"The responses to the Construction Fast Track Settlement offer revealed various ways in which firms historically determined, maintained and monitored collusive agreements. These included meetings to divide markets and agree on margins," noted the commission.

Different combinations of firms coordinated tenders over different projects. Firms colluded to create the illusion of competition by submitting sham tenders ("cover pricing") to enable a fellow conspirator to win a tender.

Three firms did not accept the Commission's settlement offer in terms of the fast track process. These are: Group 5, Construction ID and Power Construction.

"Construction firms that have not used the opportunity to disclose or settle contraventions will be investigated and prosecuted. With the evidence gathered during this process, the Commission will investigate and prosecute firms that have not disclosed any projects but are implicated by others or those that have elected to settle only some of the projects that they are implicated in," said the Commission.

The Commission is a statutory body constituted in terms of the Competition Act, No 89 of 1998 by government empowered to investigate, control and evaluate restrictive business practices, abuse of dominant positions and mergers in order to achieve equity and efficiency in the South African economy.

Last modified on Monday, 24 June 2013 20:51

Most Popular

Mall of Africa Celebrates Launch of New Generation Pick n Pay Store

Sep 23, 2019
Today Mall of Africa welcomed one of South Africa's biggest grocery retailers to the…

Exemplar REITail Acquires Katale Square Shopping Centre

Sep 23, 2019
Real estate investment trust, Exemplar REITail, has acquired Katale Square shopping…

City of Joburg Housing Development wins UN award

Sep 17, 2019
The City of Johannesburg’s Housing department has won a Sustainable Cities and Human…

Mixed-use is the key to funding hotel development in Africa

Sep 17, 2019
JLL’s research into global property transactions reveals that in the first half of 2019,…

Grit Real Estate financial results for the year-ended 30 June 2019

Sep 30, 2019
London Stock Exchange listed Grit, the only listed Africa-focused income distribution…

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.