Proposed green law 'endangers R5bn V&A plan'

Posted On Thursday, 26 June 2008 02:00 Published by
Rate this item
(0 votes)
Ports body joins buyers' plea for amendment.

Chris van Gass

Cape Correspondent

CAPE TOWN — Lawyers for the consortium that bought Cape Town’s V&A Waterfront from Transnet for R7,1bn have warned that an environmental bill passed in its present form could jeopardise a R5bn plan to develop what has been called “Africa’s Riviera”.

Transnet added its voice yesterday to objections to the Integrated Coastal Management Bill in its present form, designating all coastal land and ports as “coastal public property”. It told the Western Cape government’s standing committee on community development that the legislation would affect its operations severely. Transnet would not be able to meet legal undertakings in the V&A sale agreement.

Of concern are three small parcels of land earmarked for reclamation from the sea that are key to the development of the V&A Waterfront by its new owners, Lexshell. This is a consortium of Dubai government investment company Istithmar, part of the Dubai World group, property investment holding company London & Regional, and Western Cape black economic empowerment shareholders.

The reclamation issue was raised last week at an environmental affairs department presentation to the standing committee, when it was suggested that “ownership” of the V&A entitled Lexshell to reclaim land from the sea.

Local newspapers reported that this could have included all land between Cape Town harbour and Robben Island and already reclaimed land.

However, Transnet moved swiftly yesterday to allay fear of a “Dubai type” holiday island development, saying the three areas earmarked for reclamation were identified in an agreement in 2001 signed by the then owners of the V&A, which included Transnet and its pension funds.

The areas were restricted to those immediately next to the V&A Waterfront, and “do not include the sea areas extending from the Green Point lighthouse to Robben Island”.

National Ports Authority (NPA) CE Khomotso Phihlela said amendments to the bill were required to ensure Transnet could continue to undertake important infrastructural development of ports under its NPA division. Changes were also needed to ensure Transnet could comply with its existing “contractual and other obligations” to third parties involving ports under the control of NPA.

In addition, amendments were required to ensure that Transnet was able to comply with its existing contractual obligations to Lexshell when it came to the reclamation of land from the sea immediately adjoining the waterfront.

Hendrik Kotze, Lexshell’s lawyer, said if the bill went through in its present form it would take away the state’s ability to give ownership of the V&A Waterfront to Lexshell as well as to acquire ownership “pursuant to contractual rights that we purchased”.

Source: Business Day

Publisher: I-Net Bridge
Source: I-Net Bridge

Most Popular

53 Telkom properties coming up for auction

Mar 02, 2020
Orange Grove
GoIndustry DoveBid SA (GoIndustry) is hosting another massive property auction on behalf…

Balwin's Munyaka registers record R850 million in opening weekend sales, selling 555 apartments

Mar 09, 2020
JSE listed Balwin Properties, a developer that cares about environmentally responsible…

Young buyers driving residential property market in Bloemfontein

Mar 04, 2020
Bloem Willows
Bloemfontein is experiencing a surge in residential property transactions concluded by…

Hyprop bolsters Rosebank Mall offering through securing the Checkers Premium FreshX concept

Mar 04, 2020
Rosebank Mall
Shoppers at Rosebank Mall in Johannesburg can look forward to a world-class supermarket…

Fairvest Property Holdings maintains above-inflation growth in challenging market

Mar 02, 2020
Darren Wilder CEO Fairvest Property Holdings
Fairvest Property Holdings Limited (“Fairvest”) today again announced solid results for…

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.