Tyrant trustees can be your best allies

Posted On Monday, 24 October 2005 02:00 Published by eProp Commercial Property News
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

They insist on having their way. They’re rude, everywhere at once, and a major irritation to occupants of sectional title buildings in South Africa.

These are the trustee tyrants who make some of history’s better known dictators seem like puppy dogs.

But contrary to popular belief, tyrant trustees can be your best allies says Neville Schaefer, CEO ofNeville Schaefer, Trafalgar.

“Many owners and tenants are scared off by strict and dictatorial bodies corporate who are usually very unpopular,” says Schaefer. “But these buildings are generally the best run and should in fact be seen as a positive factor when choosing whether to live in a sectional title complex or not.”

While trustees and managing agents are the “servants” of the body corporate, they also have a sergeant major role to play, he explains.

“A tyrant may be unpleasant. But he is generally very efficient, reliable and action or job-orientated as opposed to people-orientated. This means that things will get done and be kept in good running order”.

Sectional title property, particularly, seem to attract tyrants, “partly because people are most energetic when protecting their property.”

But there is a danger. Unchecked, an authoritarian figure can start looking after his or her own interests first. “This needs to watched fairly carefully. Bending the rules for his or her own purposes results in double standards and can become quite dangerous for inhabitants of a complex.”

In this instance, Schaefer advises that a building has two main options. Firstly, a general meeting should be called and if 25% of the inhabitants rule for the removal of the trustee or chairman, this may be effected. However, he warns that this is often quite difficult to get, as the dominant tyrant personality often ends up with proxies (voting on behalf of others) and can influence the outcome.

The next step should then be the legal route. An ombudsman would play a role to establish if in fact the tyrant is acting out of self or common interest.

Very often it is proved that the action is for the common good, and if this is the case, inhabitants should be grateful despite the fact that the method of managing can be irritating.

But the irritation is a small price to pay to have a building run properly, concludes Schaefer.


Last modified on Sunday, 25 May 2014 17:51

Most Popular

Balwin's Munyaka registers record R850 million in opening weekend sales, selling 555 apartments

Mar 09, 2020
JSE listed Balwin Properties, a developer that cares about environmentally responsible…

Balwin Properties and ABSA launch South Africa’s first green home loan

Mar 13, 2020
Apartment 71933
JSE-listed Balwin Properties Limited (Balwin Properties or the Company) and Absa Group…

Growthpoint reports a steady first half with its growth strategies paying dividends

Mar 11, 2020
Growthpoint Properties Group CEO Norbert Sassee
Growthpoint Properties (JSE: GRT) reported distributable income growth of 2.2% to R3.2bn,…

Spear REIT launches innovative self-isolation campaign for returning travellers in Cape Town, South Africa to combat COVID-19:

Mar 18, 2020
Double Tree Op
JSE listed Spear REIT Limited, the owner of the Double Tree by Hilton Cape Town, is the…

Financial Fitness – Is this the right time to buy property?

Mar 20, 2020
Governor Lesetja Kganyago SARB1
With the South African Reserve Bank’s announcement of interest rates cut of 100 basis…

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.