Tuesday, 29 August 2017 13:19

ConCourt ruling on homeowners not liable for historical debt

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The Constitutional Court in the Case of Chantelle Jordaan and others V City of Tshwane Metropolitan had to determine if Section 118(3) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act 2000.

Aidan_Kenny_Werkmans

Which provides "an amount due for municipal services fees, surcharges on fees, property rates and other municipal taxes, levies and duties is a charge upon the property in connection which the amount is owing and enjoys preference over any mortgage bond registered against the property"means that the new owner can be saddled with the historical debt which a previous owner incurred.

The Court specifically focused on the words "charged upon property" as contained in Section 118 (3).

The Court had regard to inter alia the historical and common law factors and held that when a legislator creates a transmissible charge (debt) upon property, namely a debt which can be transferred from one person to another, registration in the Deeds office is required.

Notably Section 118 (3) does not require the charge to be registered or noted on the register of deeds. The Court held that this was a telling indication that the charge (the debt) only takes effect on current owners and not new owners unaware of the new historical debt. The debt effectively does not pass to the new owner, as it does not survive transfer.

The Court further held that the bill of rights prohibits arbitrary deprivation of property and Section 118 (3) must be interpreted to the effect that the historical debt of a previous owner does not pass to a new owner. Hence Section 118 (3) must be interpreted that the debt does not pass the new owner. Interestingly the Court did not declare Section 118 (3) invalid, due to the fact that the Section 118 (3) can be interpreted without constitutional objection.

The ruling of the Constitutional Court to the effect that new owners cannot be held liable for the historical debt of a previous owner, is indeed a victory for property owners and financial institutions alike.

This will certainly provide our financial institutions with peace of mind, when borrowing funds for the purchase of property, knowing that neither the owner nor the financial institutions can be deprived of their security, for the sins of the previous owner.

Municipalities will immediately have to desist with the practices of imposing and trying to collect historical debt, which they omitted to collect from a previous owner, from the new owner.

The aforesaid practices of the Municipalities is now finally declared invalid and new owners can justifiably refuse to pay such new historical debt of a previous owner.

Last modified on Thursday, 31 August 2017 13:30

Most Popular

How smart corporates are maximising returns by consolidating their property footprint

Sep 01, 2017
Amrod
For businesses that are seeking to be more efficient and productive, consolidating…

JSE listed Rebosis Property Fund announces R917 million B-BBEE transaction

Sep 01, 2017
Andile Mazwai COO Rebosis
Rebosis Property Fund, the JSE’s first listed black-managed and significantly black owned…

The Property Practitioners Bill set to transform the entire property market

Sep 19, 2017
Storme Heath CAF2
Gazetted in March 2017 for comment, the long-awaited Property Practitioners Bill is…

Growthpoint Properties posts forecast-beating distribution growth and achieves key strategic successes

Aug 31, 2017
Growthpoint Norbert Sasse
Growthpoint Properties today posted distribution growth of 6.9% per share for its…

Energy saving technologies will help consumers prepare for massive electricity price hikes in 2018

Sep 06, 2017
Cala van der Westhuizen
The latest ruling by the Constitutional Court, allowing Eskom to retrospectively ask the…